Friday, July 31, 2009
Are they twins?
Thursday, July 30, 2009
Anniversary.
"Perhaps all the dragons of our lives are princesses who are only waiting to see us once beautiful and brave." -- Rilke
Wednesday, May 27, 2009
Development update.
Saturday, May 16, 2009
Monday, May 4, 2009
Thursday, April 9, 2009
Thursday, January 8, 2009
Wednesday, December 31, 2008
It's been a while since you posted anything.
I was musing to myself yesterday, and it seemed like the kind of thing I used to post to this blog, so here goes: There's definitely something different about dealing with "a baby." What I mean by this is that when we had singleton births, there was only "the baby." Whoever was dealing with the baby was definitely dealing with "the baby." Even when Charlie was "the baby," it was clear what you were talking about when, for example, you said "Can you hold the baby while I finish cooking dinner?" Or, "Would you mind cutting up my steak? I'm holding the baby."
The words "the baby" haven't been spoken in our house since about April 2005. (I mean not together in that precise order.) That's because it's now a meaningless phrase in our house. Instead we talk in terms of "a baby." "Would you please hold a baby while I tie my shoe?" "Do you want to take a baby with you when you go to the store?"
Babies have become, in a way, a fungible good. You're not really being a productive member of the household (or for that matter any kind of worthwhile guest in our house) unless you are doing something for, with, or to, a baby. But it doesn't matter which one. They're interchangeable for this purpose, and perhaps for other purposes too. Babies come in a quantum of one, but there's definitely more than one to address. You wind up with "a baby" at a time. There is no "the baby." This may seem obvious to you, but it's weird to me that the "the baby" phenomenon that motivates the speech and action of every other set of parents simply doesn't exist in our house anymore.
Obviously we refer to them by name more than as "a baby." But a lot of times their need for attention is interchangeable. The only thing that specifically matters is which one of them is "more due" for nursing, in which case it does matter which one Ginger is holding and which one I have. But for most other purposes, you're just supposed to be helping "a baby."
Lately, the most effective form of man-to-man defense we have is Ginger with Evelyn and me with Anna. That's because Evelyn overtook Anna in the level of demand for attention. Anna can fall asleep by herself in the bouncy seat; Evelyn cannot. Anna can find her own thumb and self-soothe; Evelyn (for the most part) cannot. Anna can sleep for five hours at a stretch, day or night; Evelyn cannot. Anna can be put down and will fall asleep if you walk away; Evelyn cannot. So Evelyn gets a lot more time being held than Anna, because she needs it more. There are evenings when Ginger will suddenly realize that a day has passed and she hasn't held Anna at all except for active nursing.
There's also the fact that Anna is still taking one bottle a day, while Evelyn has been at 100% breastmilk for almost two months now. Because five ounces of formula is a lot for an eleven pound baby to work on, we try to time Anna's bottle for the very last thing of the day, to allow her to sleep through on a full tummy. Often this means waiting for Anna to wake up spontaneously at midnight, one or even two in the morning, giving her a bottle, burping her and putting her back to bed for the rest of the night. Sometimes she'll sleep as late as 8 a.m. or later under those circumstances. Because Ginger doesn't do bottles, most nights she'll take Evelyn to bed with her to "nurse out" while I stay up and wait for Anna to wake up enough to take the only bottle of the day. I'm a night owl anyway and this plays to my strengths, but it does solidify the impression that Evelyn is Ginger's baby and Anna (being less demanding) is mine. For now.
Friday, December 26, 2008
Tuesday, December 23, 2008
Christmas photo.
Of the 9,000 shots taken from this angle, this was the only one that was remotely passable. We're in for a long childhood.
Thursday, November 27, 2008
Comparisons.
Saturday, November 22, 2008
Thursday, November 13, 2008
Meet the twin: Anna.
Today's subject: Anna.
Anna, as we all know, is smaller. Her face looks more like those of the babies on Ginger's side of the family. She was more active in utero and, at least to my observation, more likely to be flailing her arms at any given moment even today.
That said, Anna is also a sleeper. Within two weeks of coming home, she was stretching her feedings to four and five hour gaps, which is not supposed to happen. We had to wake her up to give her a bottle. Even now, we sometimes realize all of a sudden that it's been way too long since Anna's last feeding, because she's been quiet and cuddly without any complaint.
She's a better nurser of the two, although her lighter weight means that we're supplementing her with bottles while Evelyn is basically at 100% breastfed for now. You might conclude by looking at them that their size disparity is fundamental to their natures and may be permanent. Perhaps I'm jumping to this conclusion because Patrick was underweight for some time and is today a skinny little kid, while Charlie, well, has always been Charlie. Even considering this, Anna just seems like a more delicate type. We're prepared to be surprised.
She is showing signs of red hair, like Charlie's, though a bit lighter.
On the nickname front, our use of "Kitten" for Evelyn in daily life is growing more infrequent. It comes up now and again, but there's no nickname for her that's in regular use. We sometimes still use "Mouse" for Anna because she still squeaks quite a bit, particularly when we are waking her up. More frequently we refer to Anna as "Anna Banana" or just plain "Banana." Ginger shortens this to "Anna B." or sometimes just "B."














